Show table of contents · 12 sections▾
Nothing here is legal advice. The frameworks below are consistent with widespread practice; consult your attorney for anything case-specific.
Arizona at a Glance
Arizona is a moderately plaintiff-friendly Southwest jurisdiction with pure comparative fault, no damages caps, and mature legal markets in Phoenix (Maricopa County) and Tucson (Pima County). Pre-settlement funding is available statewide with industry-standard pricing.
Pure Comparative Fault (§12-2505)
Under Arizona Revised Statutes §12-2505, a plaintiff's own negligence does not bar recovery — damages are reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. Even a 90% at-fault plaintiff recovers 10% of damages. This is dramatically more plaintiff-favorable than modified comparative fault states.
No Damage Caps
Arizona has no cap on non-economic or total damages in personal injury cases. The Arizona Constitution (Article 2, §31) prohibits laws limiting damages in death or personal injury cases — a rare state constitutional protection.
Punitive Damages
Punitive damages available for aggravated, outrageous, or intentional misconduct. Clear and convincing evidence standard. No statutory cap, though excessive punitive awards face constitutional due-process review.
Statute of Limitations
| Case type | Statute (years) |
|---|---|
| Personal injury | 2 |
| Medical malpractice | 2 (discovery rule) |
| Wrongful death | 2 |
| Product liability | 2 |
| Property damage | 2 |
Auto Insurance Minimums
Arizona minimums (raised 2020): $25K bodily injury per person / $50K per accident / $15K property damage. UM/UIM offered but not mandatory. Because minimums are relatively low, UM/UIM coverage is strongly recommended.
Arizona Court System
Arizona has 15 counties. Superior Court is the general jurisdiction trial court. Appeals go to the Arizona Court of Appeals (Divisions One and Two). The Arizona Supreme Court takes discretionary review. Maricopa County has the state's largest civil docket.
Notable Arizona Verdict Venues
- Maricopa County (Phoenix, Scottsdale, Tempe): Largest urban market; moderate plaintiff-friendly trends.
- Pima County (Tucson): Similar plaintiff trends to Maricopa.
- Rural counties: More defense-friendly.
Pre-Settlement Funding Regulatory Status
Arizona has no dedicated pre-settlement funding statute. Arizona Consumer Fraud Act (§44-1521 et seq.) applies to consumer transactions. Standard contract law governs enforcement.
Common Arizona Case Types
- Motor vehicle collisions on I-10, I-17, US-60.
- Trucking cases along I-10 freight corridor.
- Premises liability (retail, hospitality, resorts).
- Medical malpractice at Banner, HonorHealth, Mayo Scottsdale.
- Nursing home neglect (Arizona has many licensed facilities).
- Product liability including recreational vehicles.
The Bottom Line
Arizona combines constitutionally-protected no-damages-cap policy with pure comparative fault — creating a plaintiff-friendly recovery environment. Pre-settlement funding is available at industry-standard rates. Cases in Maricopa and Pima Counties resolve at solid values.
Instabridge Funding underwrites cases across all fifty states, with pricing and offer sizing that reflect the specific rules of the state your case sits in. Apply for a pre-settlement advance or ask your attorney to route the file through our attorney portal. Decisions typically return within 24 hours of a complete case file.
Frequently asked questions
Pure comparative fault. Plaintiffs recover damages reduced by their percentage of fault, regardless of that percentage. Even 90% at-fault plaintiffs recover 10%.
No. Arizona's Constitution (Article 2, §31) prohibits caps on damages in death or personal injury cases.
Two years for most personal injury cases including medical malpractice and wrongful death.
$25K bodily injury per person, $50K per accident, $15K property damage. UM/UIM offered but not mandatory.
No dedicated statute. Arizona Consumer Fraud Act applies to deceptive practices.
Maricopa (Phoenix) and Pima (Tucson) have the largest civil dockets with moderate plaintiff-friendly trends.
No statutory cap, but subject to constitutional due-process review for excessive awards.
