Guide
Winning a verdict should bring relief—but in many cases, it doesn’t bring immediate payment. When a defendant files an appeal, compensation can be delayed for months or even years. During this time, plaintiffs often continue facing medical costs, lost income, and everyday living expenses, with no access to the funds they’ve already been awarded.
Pre-settlement funding can still be available during the appeals process, providing critical financial support while the legal system runs its course. This article explains how funding works after a verdict, what changes during an appeal, and when funding may be an option.
Why Appeals Delay Compensation
After a verdict, defendants may appeal for several reasons, including:
Challenging liability findings
Disputing damages awarded
Alleging legal or procedural errors
Attempting to reduce or overturn the verdict
Appeals often involve lengthy briefing schedules, court reviews, and oral arguments. Even strong verdicts can take a long time to become final and payable.
Does an Appeal Cancel Pre-Settlement Funding?
No.
An appeal does not cancel existing pre-settlement funding or prevent new funding in appropriate cases.
Key points to understand:
Funding remains tied to the case outcome
Repayment is still required only if compensation is ultimately received
No payments are required during the appeal
If the verdict is overturned and no recovery occurs, no repayment is owed
Funding remains non-recourse, even during post-trial proceedings.
Can You Apply for Funding After a Verdict?
In many cases, yes—especially if:
Liability has already been established
A jury verdict has been awarded
Insurance coverage is confirmed
Your attorney confirms a strong likelihood of recovery
In fact, funding approval may be easier after a verdict, because risk is often lower than in pre-trial stages.
How Funding Helps Plaintiffs During Appeals
Appeals can be one of the most financially stressful phases of a case. Funding can help plaintiffs:
Continue medical treatment
Pay rent or mortgage
Cover utilities and daily living costs
Avoid debt or collections
Resist pressure to accept reduced post-verdict settlements
Maintain stability while the appeal is resolved
Insurance companies may offer discounted settlements during appeals—funding gives plaintiffs the ability to wait.
Important Differences Between Pre-Trial and Post-Verdict Funding
While funding remains non-recourse, post-verdict funding typically considers:
Size of the verdict
Strength of the appeal grounds
Insurance policy limits
Attorney assessment of appeal risk
Expected timeline for resolution
Funding amounts are carefully structured to protect the final recovery.
Why Responsible Funding Matters During Appeals
Because verdicts can be reduced or reversed, ethical funding providers must:
Evaluate appeal risk conservatively
Limit advances to safe amounts
Coordinate closely with the attorney
Protect the plaintiff’s long-term outcome
Instabridge prioritizes responsible funding decisions to avoid over-leveraging during uncertain post-trial phases.
Why Plaintiffs Trust Instabridge for Appeal-Stage Funding
Instabridge understands the complexities of post-verdict litigation. We offer:
Case re-evaluation after verdicts
Transparent, flat-rate pricing
Non-recourse protection
Attorney collaboration throughout appeals
Clear explanations of risk and timing
We help plaintiffs stay financially secure without compromising their award.
Conclusion: Appeals Don’t End the Need for Support
An appeal doesn’t erase a verdict—but it can delay justice. Pre-settlement funding from Instabridge helps plaintiffs stay stable while appeals are resolved, ensuring that financial pressure doesn’t undermine hard-earned legal victories.
If you’ve won a verdict and are facing an appeal, contact Instabridge today. We’ll review your case, explain your options, and help you determine whether funding is available during this stage.





















































































































































